|
Anti-Gravenor protest
In his column about the recent police brutality demonstration [The
false leaders, March 21] Kristian Gravenor exemplifies an almost
unimaginable level of stupidity and conformity.
First, he dismisses the anti-police protest as trivial, since we no
longer live during the old days (197985) when one cop killed 1020
people. Second, he disregards a number of questionable circumstances
(cops wont release a video) surrounding the death of Michael Kibbe,
with a sly joke about him dying from a lack of physical contact
with cops. Third, he justifies police brutality, since he has
no problem with cops beating up child molesters (it is not child molesters
the police brutalize, but rather street youth and racial minorities).
Fourth, he mocks the organizers by saying that the COPB leaders
allowed cops to put more youth on file. I think this is called
blaming the victim, since according to La Presse there were six windows
broken, two cop cars and one wall spray painted. Yet 371 people were
arrested, equaling approximately 40 people per incident. I guess us
demonstrators are not as good at breaking stuff as we thought.
Lastly, Gravenor states that anybody at the pointless protest
who ends up with a criminal conviction will lose the right to work in
many jobs and travel at will. This shows his misunderstanding
of the importance of protesting the increasing brutality (pepper spray
at APEC, the fence at Windsor, tear gas, rubber bullets and a bigger
fence in Quebec City) and power (c36, c35, c42) of the police force.
Its too bad I had to read Peter Hadekel in the Gazette to find
someone who questions the second largest arrest in Montreal history.
Yves Engler
I would like to
publicly and formally congratulate Kristian Gravenor on making the transition
from vaguely smug and kind of annoying to full-on, hardcore, virulently
anti-social fascist. Im assuming, according to your tirade against
anti-police brutality groups, sex worker groups and housing groups,
that you would happily allow the abuse of police authority to go unchecked.
You would applaud wildly as prostitutes were raped by police, harassed
by local yuppies and had their heads bashed in by abusive johns. You
would toast the abysmally low housing rates and extortionate Montreal
rents from your nest above the rest of us, amongst those upon whom society,
authority and good fortune have smiled.
Meanwhile, we unwashed, uneducated, `drug-addled masses will continue
to fight for a more peaceful, tolerant, open-minded society for you
to live in. Bravo, you jackass.
Sholem Krishtalka
Pro-Gravenor
Holy crap, K. Gravenor! I read your March 21 column and was genuinely
and pleasantly shocked to see that you were suggesting that marginalization
is not in the best interests of the marginalized.
I cant stand right-wingers most of the time for their bootstraps
this, and their threat of destitution as motivation, that. But when
they talk about the victim culture, I grudgingly shut my mouth in acknowledgement
of the unhealthiness of it.
Anyway, it impressed the hell out of me that it came from you, who could
never be confused for Barbara Amiels dildo.
Rob van Hell
Moderate
vegetarian
I am responding to Laurent Cauchons letter from March 28 in which
he accuses PETA of hypocrisy and puts it down [Anti-PETA].
I am not a member of PETA but have a girlfriend who became totally vegetarian
a few years ago and now has a much easier time maintaining her ideal
weight (she also has worked as a model). In sharp contrast, her junk-food-eating
brother who loves hamburgers is massively overweight and so are her
mother and father.
What is so wrong with promoting vegetarianism for health and moral reasons?
I criticize PETA when they try to ban milk consumption and go overboard
in liberating all zoo animals, but face it: PETA does plenty of good
too. And moderates like me need to say this.
People like Mr. Cauchon need to work in a slaughterhouse before they
buy meat. He may not want to be vegetarian, but at the same time he
needs to stop wearing blinders.
Aldous Denton
|