|
|
|
The thing that really grates about this is the lie that stronger copyright laws are needed to “protect new knowledge”—as if making it harder and more expensive to access media will lead to increased innovation. The old saw is that Canada doesn’t “innovate”—i.e. invent Viagra—because there is less money to be made in doing so here, because it’s harder to “protect” your work. That might be true for pharmaceutical companies, but using that as an excuse to clamp down on pirated music, or watching Andy Samberg videos on non-NBC Web sites, is disingenuous at best. No one, not a fucking person, can look at the quality (i.e. the “innovation”) of Canadian music and say that it suffered because of our supposedly rampant file-sharing. This whole business has never been about protecting artists. It is, of course, about money. And please, please, record companies—I wish you would say that. We could respect that. Show us the services you provide. Show us how we don’t want to live in a (record) label-less world of MySpace pages. That we do—we really do—want someone overseeing quality, that we want a music “industry.” That, in short, you deserve money because of the services you provide—not because you used to make a lot more in the past. END RANT... ssinnott@gmail.com
|
| COVER | INSIDE | NEWS | MUSIC/FILM/ARTS
| ENTERTAINMENT
LISTINGS | LETTERS | COLUMNS SEARCH | WEBMASTER | STAFF - CONTACT US | ARCHIVES | SITEMAP |
| © Communications Gratte-Ciel Ltée
2009 |