|
Wild card >> Destroyer’s Dan Bejar is no joker |
|
by LORRAINE CARPENTER
Mirror: Does your work come naturally, or is it labour-intensive? Dan Bejar: The music comes less and less naturally the more I do it. Even once I pound out the chords and try to cinch some semblance of a vocal melody, things can still change around a lot depending on who’s playing or recording the song—it’s real collaborative. I don’t labour over lyrics, but I write way, way slower than I did in the ’90s. This all being said, I thought Destroyer’s Rubies was really easy, which probably has a lot to do with the band. M: I imagine you’ve gotten more comfortable performing live. DB: Comfort doesn’t really come into play, but dragging my ass on stage inspires slightly less terror than it used to. M: You’ve said that you’re no fan of touring. I imagine that singing with humour and feeling, over and over again, becomes like acting. How do you deal? DB: The times when it feels like acting wear me down, like they would anyone who isn’t a very good actor. Other times, I can get really into it, but doing it for a month straight is rough. I still get pretty nervous. Nervous, then despondent. M: A lot of people (including myself) have described Destroyer’s Rubies as more accessible than your previous work. Was that intentional? DB: It was not intentional, and I don’t think it’s the most “accessible” Destroyer album. There is usually an idea going into a recording, but I would say that this record was the most open-ended in that the original idea got tossed out pretty early on in the game and we just did what came naturally. M: You’ve hit the glossies with this latest album, but I get the impression that you’re not entirely comfortable with media coverage, particularly the mainstream media. DB: Obviously, if I had the luxury, I would pass on doing press altogether. Mainstream and “underground” alike have had very little interest in Destroyer activities up until the last couple years, but these days I do stuff that’s necessary to generate the kind of attention that will translate into raw revenue. Thing is, mainstream coverage is usually so ham-handed, and not very functional in generating album [or ticket] sales, that in the end it’s probably more harmful than anything. It’s not so much political, as just trying to save your own ass in the long run, which I guess is kinda political. But it’s not like I spend my days dis-inviting myself from Letterman and Spin magazine either. With Magnolia Electric Co. and Nedelle at |
| MIRROR ARCHIVES » Mar 23-29.2006: INSIDE - COVER | ARCHIVES INDEX | CURRENT ISSUE SITEMAP | STAFF | WEBMASTER |
| © Communications Gratte-Ciel Ltée 2006 |